Skip to main content



Design Patterns (aka DP), Creational - Singleton Pattern

DP is a well-described solution to a common software problem. Its benefits:
  • Already defined to solve a problem.
  • Increase code reusability and robustness.
  • Faster devlopment and new developers in team can understand it easily
DP defined in to 3 categories:
  • Creational - Used to construct objects such that they can be decoupled from their implementing system.
  • Structural - Used to form large object structures between many disparate objects
  • Behavioral - Used to manage algorithms, relationships, and responsibilities between objects.

Creational:

  • Singleton - Singleton pattern restricts the instantiation of a class and ensures that only one instance of the class exists in the jvm.

We have different approaches for Singleton but all of these follow below bullets:

  • Private constructor
  • Private static variable of same class i.e. only instance of class.
  • Public static method of class that returns the instance.
A few points to think about before implementation:
  • You  want eager initialization or lazy initialization of object.
  • Exception handling of object if creation fails.
  • Thread safety
  • Reflection can break into this pattern. So, do you want to allow it or not.
  • Serialization can destroy this pattern.
Keeping above points in mind we can implement over pattern. Below code depicts 2 such implementations and rest depends upon you to implement it differently or choose any of the one detailed below.


package com.test.command.dp.creational.singleton;

public enum EnumSingleton {

       INSTANCE;
      
       public void aboutMe(){
              System.out.println("Dinesh Sachdev (Indore)");
       }
}

package com.test.command.dp.creational.singleton;

import java.io.Serializable;

public class SerializedSingleton implements Serializable {

       /**
        *
        */
       private static final long serialVersionUID = -1L;
      
       private SerializedSingleton(){}
      
       private static class SingletonHelper{
              private static final SerializedSingleton instance =
                           new SerializedSingleton();
             
       }
      
       public static SerializedSingleton getInstance(){
              return SingletonHelper.instance;
       }

       protected Object readResolve(){
              return getInstance();
       }

}



Comments

Popular posts

Spring MongoDB Rename field with derived Value of another field

Input Collection -  [ { 'k' : 'Troubleshooting' , 'hour' : '2024-10-10T16' , 'v' : [ 'WebPage, Login' ] }, { 'k' : 'TroubleshootingMe' , 'hour' : '2024-10-07T01' , 'v' : [ 'Accounts, etc' ] }  ] Expected Output -  [ { 'hour' : '2024-10-10T16' , 'Troubleshooting' : [ 'WebPage, Login' ] }, { 'hour' : '2024-10-07T01' , 'TroubleshootingMe' : [ 'Accounts, etc' ] }  ]   Above Can be achieved by  $replaceRoot / $replaceWith as follows - { $replaceWith : { $mergeObjects : [ { hour : "$hour" }, { "$arrayToObject" : [ [ { k : "$k" , v : "$v" } ] ] } ] } } or { $replaceRoo...




What is Leadership

 




Spark Error - missing part 0 of the schema, 2 parts are expected

 Exception -  Caused by: org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException : Could not read schema from the hive metastore because it is corrupted. (missing part 0 of the schema, 2 parts are expected).; Analysis -  ·          Check for table definition. In TBLProperties, you might find something like this – > spark.sql.sources.schema.numPartCols > 'spark.sql.sources.schema.numParts' 'spark.sql.sources.schema.part.0' > 'spark.sql.sources.schema.part.1' 'spark.sql.sources.schema.part.2' > 'spark.sql.sources.schema.partCol.0' > 'spark.sql.sources.schema.partCol.1' That’s what error seems to say that part1 is defined but part0 is missing.  Solution -  Drop & re-create table. If Table was partitioned  then all partitions  would have been removed. So do either of below -  ·          Msck repair table <db_name>.<table_name> ·    ...




Spark MongoDB Connector Not leading to correct count or data while reading

  We are using Scala 2.11 , Spark 2.4 and Spark MongoDB Connector 2.4.4 Use Case 1 - We wanted to read a Shareded Mongo Collection and copy its data to another Mongo Collection. We noticed that after Spark Job successful completion. Output MongoDB did not had many records. Use Case 2 -  We read a MongoDB collection and doing count on dataframe lead to different count on each execution. Analysis,  We realized that MongoDB Spark Connector is missing data on bulk read as a dataframe. We tried various partitioner, listed on page -  https://www.mongodb.com/docs/spark-connector/v2.4/configuration/  But, none of them worked for us. Finally, we tried  MongoShardedPartitioner  this lead to constant count on each execution. But, it was greater than the actual count of records on the collection. This seems to be limitation with MongoDB Spark Connector. But,  MongoShardedPartitioner  seemed closest possible solution to this kind of situation. But, it per...




Read from a hive table and write back to it using spark sql

In context to Spark 2.2 - if we read from an hive table and write to same, we get following exception- scala > dy . write . mode ( "overwrite" ). insertInto ( "incremental.test2" ) org . apache . spark . sql . AnalysisException : Cannot insert overwrite into table that is also being read from .; org . apache . spark . sql . AnalysisException : Cannot insert overwrite into table that is also being read from .; 1. This error means that our process is reading from same table and writing to same table. 2. Normally, this should work as process writes to directory .hiveStaging... 3. This error occurs in case of saveAsTable method, as it overwrites entire table instead of individual partitions. 4. This error should not occur with insertInto method, as it overwrites partitions not the table. 5. A reason why this happening is because Hive table has following Spark TBLProperties in its definition. This problem will solve for insertInto met...