Skip to main content



Design Patterns (aka DP), Creational - Factory Pattern

DP is a well-described solution to a common software problem. Its benefits:

  • Already defined to solve a problem.
  • Increase code reusability and robustness.
  • Faster devlopment and new developers in team can understand it easily
DP defined in to 3 categories:
  • Creational - Used to construct objects such that they can be decoupled from their implementing system.
  • Structural - Used to form large object structures between many disparate objects
  • Behavioral - Used to manage algorithms, relationships, and responsibilities between objects.
  • Factory - Exposes a method for creating objects, allowing sub-classes to control the actual creation process.
Consider a scenario as below:-
  • You have an interface or abstract class or a normal class. Computer class
  • There are 2 sub-classes of of Computer. PC class and Server class
  • Now you have a factory which provides you Computers. And you can give specification to factory whether you want a PC or Server.
Below code implements above scenario:

package com.test.command.dp.creational.factory;

/**Abstract class**/ 
public abstract class Computer {

       public abstract String getRAM();

       public abstract String getHDD();

       public abstract String getCPU();

       @Override
       public String toString() {

              return "RAM= " + this.getRAM() + ", HDD=" + this.getHDD() + ", CPU="
                           + this.getCPU();
       }

}

package com.test.command.dp.creational.factory;

public class PC extends Computer {

       private String ram;
       private String hdd;
       private String cpu;

       public PC(String ram, String hdd, String cpu) {
              this.ram = ram;
              this.hdd = hdd;
              this.cpu = cpu;
       }

       @Override
       public String getRAM() {
              // TODO Auto-generated method stub
              return this.ram;
       }

       @Override
       public String getHDD() {
              // TODO Auto-generated method stub
              return this.hdd;
       }

       @Override
       public String getCPU() {
              // TODO Auto-generated method stub
              return this.cpu;
       }

}

package com.test.command.dp.creational.factory;

public class Server extends Computer {

       private String ram;
       private String hdd;
       private String cpu;
      
      

       public Server(String ram, String hdd, String cpu) {
             
              this.ram = ram;
              this.hdd = hdd;
              this.cpu = cpu;
       }

       @Override
       public String getRAM() {
              // TODO Auto-generated method stub
              return this.ram;
       }

       @Override
       public String getHDD() {
              // TODO Auto-generated method stub
              return this.hdd;
       }

       @Override
       public String getCPU() {
              // TODO Auto-generated method stub
              return this.cpu;
       }

}


package com.test.command.dp.creational.factory;

/**Factory**/
public class ComputerFactory {

       public static Computer getComputer(String type, String ram, String hdd, String cpu){
              if("PC".equalsIgnoreCase(type)){
                     return new PC(ram, hdd, cpu);
              }
              else if("Server".equalsIgnoreCase(type)){
                     return new Server(ram, hdd, cpu);
              }
              return null;
       }
      
       public static void main(String[] args) {
              Computer pc = ComputerFactory.getComputer("PC", null, null, null);
              Computer server = ComputerFactory.getComputer("SERVER", "12", null, null);
             
              System.out.println("Your PC Dinesh Sachdev. Delivered to Indore:"+pc);
              System.out.println("Your Server Dinesh Sachdev. Delivered to Indore:"+server);
       }
}

Comments

Popular posts

Unix Server ( Edge Node ) hangs when there are many jobs running on hadoop cluster started from Unix Edge Node.

  When a unix server or an edge node is running lots of jobs (like Spark, Hadoop, or custom batch processes), crashes happen. For example. For example a process might hit a segementation fault, memory issue or ay other runtime issue. By default, if ulimit -c is not 0, the OS will create core dump. Core dump are written to disk and can be very large, sometimes hundreds of MBs or even GBs per process. What we realized was that when multiple processes crash at the same time, the system suddenly tries to write core files to disk. This was leading to DisK I/O spikes. Thus, node was becoming unresponsive. This was also leading CPU spike because OS was handling crash logging. Setting "ulimit -c 0" disables core dumps. This way we lose ability to debug crashes via core dump But, kept production edge nodes stable. On most Linux systems, by default, "core dumps" are written in current working directory of the process that crashes. Linux allows you to change core dump file nam...




VPN testing checklist

 To test: Is VPN active? Is it leaking? Does it look residential? Does it alter network fingerprints? Public IP Test (Basic Detection) - curl ipinfo.io DNS Leak Test - nslookup google.com MTU Test (Encapsulation Detection) - ping 8.8.8.8 -f -l 1472 TCP MSS Inspection - Use Wireshark and Look for SYN packets. Traceroute Path Test - tracert 8.8.8.8 WebRTC Leak Test - browserleaks.com/webrtc IPv6 Leak Test - test-ipv6.com Latency / Jitter Test - ping -n 50 8.8.8.8. VPN usually causes: More Jitters and Latency. Reverse DNS (PTR Record) - nslookup <your-public-ip> IP Reputation Check - Like most IP's from VPN Providers like Express VPN, etc. are blacklisted and all. Look for: Proxy/VPN classification, Hosting provider tagging




Spark-JDBC connection with Oracle Fails - java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-00903: invalid table name

  While connecting Spark with Oracle JDBC, one may observe exception like below -  spark.read.format("jdbc"). option("url", "jdbc:oracle:thin:@//oraclehost:1521/servicename"). option("dbtable", "mytable"). option("user", "myuser").option("driver", "oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver") option("password", "mypassword"). load().write.parquet("/data/out") java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-00903: invalid table name at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:447) at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:396) at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.processError(T4C8Oall.java:951) at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIfun.receive(T4CTTIfun.java:513) at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIfun.doRPC(T4CTTIfun.java:227) at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.doOALL(T4C8Oall.java:531) at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.doOall8(T4CPreparedStatement.java:208) ...




Spring MongoDB Rest API not returning response in 90 seconds which is leading to client timeout

  We have Spring Boot  Rest API deployed in Kubernetes cluster which integrates with MongoDB to fetch the data.  MongoDB is fed with data by a real time Spark & NiFi job.  Our clients complained that for a request what they send they don't have response within 90 seconds. Consider it like an OMS ( Order ManagEment System).  On further analysis, we found that Spark & NiFi processing is happenning within 10 seconds after consuming response data from Kafka. Thus, initally out thought was that it due to delay from upstream to produce data in to Kafka.  Thankfully, our data had create / request  timestamp, and when response was received, and when response was inserted into MongoDB. Subtracting response insert time from request time seemed to be well within 90 seconds. But, still client did timeout on not seeing a response within 90 seconds. This led to confusion on our side.  But, then we realized it was due to Read Preference . We updated this...




MongoDB Regex Query taking more time in Production but same query perform well in UAT

   We came across a situation where-in, MongoDB Query was taking more time in Production like 10 seconds and 4.2 seconds but same query performed well in UAT taking under 400 ms. The very first thought that was evident to us that it is because of amount of data which differed in UAT and Production. Then we ran following to see the execution plan -   db.collection.aggregate(<queries>).explain() This gave us Winning and Rejected Plans. Under which, we analyzed that although it was using 'IXSCAN.' But, it was incorrect index- as we had one compound index built on time field and other fields, and there was other index just on time field for TTL purposes. Winning plan picked TTL index rather than compound index. Thus, we dropped TTL index and built TTL index on a different time field.  That got our query performance time from 10 seconds to 726 ms. Also, for other query the performance came down from 8 seconds to 4.3 seconds. Then, we ran following -  ...