Skip to main content



Experience with MongoDB and Optimizations

 

Experience with MongoDB and Optimizations

  • Before reading below. I would like to point out that this experience is related to version 6.0.14-ent, having 6 shards, each shard having 3 machines, each machine is VM with 140 GB RAM and 2TB SSD. And, we had been hosting almost 36 TB of data.

  • MongoDB is not good with Big Data Joins and/ or Big Data OLAP processing. It is mainly meant for OLTP purposes. 
  • Instead of joining millions of keys between 2 collections. It is better to lookup data of one key from one collection then lookup it in other collection. Thus, merging data from 2 collection for same key.
  • Its better to keep De-normalized data in one document. 
  • Updating a document later is cumbersome. 
  • MongoDB crash if data is overloaded. And, it has long downtime if crashed unlike other databases which fails write to database if disk space achieves certain limit. Thus, keeping database active and running for read traffic.
  • MongoDB needs indexes for fast querying, and indexing can take long time based on size of data.
  • Reading one MongoDB collection and writing to another MongoDB collection can be very slow. To make it fast- one can utilize distributed computing framework like Spark but that leads to data loss scanning full MongoDB collection.
  • Indexes occupy space if data is big. 
  • Always use Sharding. Range Sharding should be avoided because it leads writes going to one shard when bulk data is loaded. Hash Sharding distrubutes write traffic better among shards. 
  • Note that Chunks can grow in size to a high value in MongoDB. As MongoDB do not care about number of Chunks rather it relies more on equal distrubution of data ( size) among shards. 
  • Theoretically, MongoDB says there is no limit to size of collection. But we have seen that as collection size grows above 2 TB - writes to collections slows down. So, it's better to have 12 collections for 1 year rather having 1 collection with 12 years of data.
  • Having multiple collections instead of one can also be advantageous from API application perspective as well. Rather than querying one collection. Application can concurrently fire same query to multiple collections and merge there results. Thus, optimizing response time. 
  • Breaking collection also resolves time it would take build indexes on collection. Also, gives fail safety that in worst case one collection can go bad, not all 12 collections will screw up. 
  • It’s always good practice to ensure connection pool on MongoDB. So, as to not over-utilize TCP pool which in turn can hinder I/O operattions
  • MongoDB by default will have unique index on _id. If possible, try to utilize same for shard key or unique index to avoid an additional index. 
  • Note that you may not specify a unique constraint on a hashed index.
  • Starting in MongoDB 7.0.3 (and 6.0.12 and 5.0.22), you can drop the index for a hashed shard key. This can speed up data insertion for collections sharded with a hashed shard key. It can also speed up data ingestion when using mongosync.
  • It's better to bulk load collections then built indexes on same. Rather than running bulk load on collection which has all the indexes. 

Comments

Popular posts

Python [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: Missing Authority Key Identifier

  Error requests.exceptions.SSLError: HTTPSConnectionPool  Max retries exceeded with url:  (Caused by SSLError(SSLCertVerificationError(1, '[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: Missing Authority Key Identifier (_ssl.c:1028)'))). Analysis & Solution Recently, we updated from Python 3.11 to 3.13, which resulted in error above. We did verify AKI = SKI in chain of certificates. Also, imported chain of certificates into certifi. Nothing worked for us. Seemingly, it is a bug with Python 3.13. So, we downgraded to Python 3.12 and it started working. Other problems and solution -  '[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: self-signed certificate in certificate chain (_ssl.c:1006)'))) solution  pip install pip-system-certs [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: certificate has expired  (_ssl.c:1006) solution  1# openssl s_client -showcerts -connect  signin.aws.amazon.com:443  </dev/...




Spring MongoDB Rest API not returning response in 90 seconds which is leading to client timeout

  We have Spring Boot  Rest API deployed in Kubernetes cluster which integrates with MongoDB to fetch the data.  MongoDB is fed with data by a real time Spark & NiFi job.  Our clients complained that for a request what they send they don't have response within 90 seconds. Consider it like an OMS ( Order ManagEment System).  On further analysis, we found that Spark & NiFi processing is happenning within 10 seconds after consuming response data from Kafka. Thus, initally out thought was that it due to delay from upstream to produce data in to Kafka.  Thankfully, our data had create / request  timestamp, and when response was received, and when response was inserted into MongoDB. Subtracting response insert time from request time seemed to be well within 90 seconds. But, still client did timeout on not seeing a response within 90 seconds. This led to confusion on our side.  But, then we realized it was due to Read Preference . We updated this...




MongoDB Regex Query taking more time in Production but same query perform well in UAT

   We came across a situation where-in, MongoDB Query was taking more time in Production like 10 seconds and 4.2 seconds but same query performed well in UAT taking under 400 ms. The very first thought that was evident to us that it is because of amount of data which differed in UAT and Production. Then we ran following to see the execution plan -   db.collection.aggregate(<queries>).explain() This gave us Winning and Rejected Plans. Under which, we analyzed that although it was using 'IXSCAN.' But, it was incorrect index- as we had one compound index built on time field and other fields, and there was other index just on time field for TTL purposes. Winning plan picked TTL index rather than compound index. Thus, we dropped TTL index and built TTL index on a different time field.  That got our query performance time from 10 seconds to 726 ms. Also, for other query the performance came down from 8 seconds to 4.3 seconds. Then, we ran following -  ...




What is Leadership

 




Spark MongoDB Connector Not leading to correct count or data while reading

  We are using Scala 2.11 , Spark 2.4 and Spark MongoDB Connector 2.4.4 Use Case 1 - We wanted to read a Shareded Mongo Collection and copy its data to another Mongo Collection. We noticed that after Spark Job successful completion. Output MongoDB did not had many records. Use Case 2 -  We read a MongoDB collection and doing count on dataframe lead to different count on each execution. Analysis,  We realized that MongoDB Spark Connector is missing data on bulk read as a dataframe. We tried various partitioner, listed on page -  https://www.mongodb.com/docs/spark-connector/v2.4/configuration/  But, none of them worked for us. Finally, we tried  MongoShardedPartitioner  this lead to constant count on each execution. But, it was greater than the actual count of records on the collection. This seems to be limitation with MongoDB Spark Connector. But,  MongoShardedPartitioner  seemed closest possible solution to this kind of situation. But, it per...