Skip to main content



HBase Performance Optimization

 

Please refer - 

  • First blog in series to reduce Regions on Region Server - https://techdevins.blogspot.com/2023/03/hbase-utility-merging-regions-in-hbase.html
  • Second to delete column's in HBase - https://techdevins.blogspot.com/2019/11/hbase-bulk-delete-column-qualifiers.html

In this article, we would discuss options to further optimize HBase.

  • We could use COMPRESSION=>'SNAPPY' for Column families. And, invoke Major Compaction right after setting the property. This will reduce size of tables by 70% yet giving same read & write performance. Once size of regions & tables is compressed then we can re invoke the Merge Region utility to reduce number of regions per server.
  • Set Region Split policy as - SPLIT_POLICY=>'org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.ConstantSizeRegionSplitPolicy'
  • Enable Request Throttle by setting hbase.quota.enabled to true
    • Our HBase Cluster is used by 
      • Real Time Api's
      • as well as Analytical Spark & MR Jobs.
    • Analytical workloads creates huge and uncontrolled traffic on the cluster in terms of request per seconds. One possible way to address this issue is to throttle analytical jobs so that real-time workloads are less affected. 
    • HBase has Request Throttling (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11598) feature that can be used to give more priority to Real Time Calls over Analytical Calls. HBase typically treats all requests identically; however, the new throttling feature can be used to specify a maximum rate or bandwidth to override this behavior.  The limit may be applied to a requests originating from a particular user, or alternatively, to requests directed to a given table or a specified namespace. For example - 
      • hbase> set_quota TYPE => THROTTLE, USER => 'uname', LIMIT => '100req/sec'

        hbase> set_quota TYPE => THROTTLE, TABLE => 'tbl', LIMIT => '10M/sec'

        hbase> set_quota TYPE => THROTTLE, NAMESPACE => 'ns', LIMIT => 'NONE'

    • Note - The related parameter hbase.quota.refresh.period  specifies the time interval in milliseconds that that regionserver should re-check for any new restrictions that have been added.

Comments

Popular posts

Python [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: Missing Authority Key Identifier

  Error requests.exceptions.SSLError: HTTPSConnectionPool  Max retries exceeded with url:  (Caused by SSLError(SSLCertVerificationError(1, '[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: Missing Authority Key Identifier (_ssl.c:1028)'))). Analysis & Solution Recently, we updated from Python 3.11 to 3.13, which resulted in error above. We did verify AKI = SKI in chain of certificates. Also, imported chain of certificates into certifi. Nothing worked for us. Seemingly, it is a bug with Python 3.13. So, we downgraded to Python 3.12 and it started working. Other problems and solution -  '[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: self-signed certificate in certificate chain (_ssl.c:1006)'))) solution  pip install pip-system-certs [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: certificate has expired  (_ssl.c:1006) solution  1# openssl s_client -showcerts -connect  signin.aws.amazon.com:443  </dev/...




Spring MongoDB Rest API not returning response in 90 seconds which is leading to client timeout

  We have Spring Boot  Rest API deployed in Kubernetes cluster which integrates with MongoDB to fetch the data.  MongoDB is fed with data by a real time Spark & NiFi job.  Our clients complained that for a request what they send they don't have response within 90 seconds. Consider it like an OMS ( Order ManagEment System).  On further analysis, we found that Spark & NiFi processing is happenning within 10 seconds after consuming response data from Kafka. Thus, initally out thought was that it due to delay from upstream to produce data in to Kafka.  Thankfully, our data had create / request  timestamp, and when response was received, and when response was inserted into MongoDB. Subtracting response insert time from request time seemed to be well within 90 seconds. But, still client did timeout on not seeing a response within 90 seconds. This led to confusion on our side.  But, then we realized it was due to Read Preference . We updated this...




MongoDB Regex Query taking more time in Production but same query perform well in UAT

   We came across a situation where-in, MongoDB Query was taking more time in Production like 10 seconds and 4.2 seconds but same query performed well in UAT taking under 400 ms. The very first thought that was evident to us that it is because of amount of data which differed in UAT and Production. Then we ran following to see the execution plan -   db.collection.aggregate(<queries>).explain() This gave us Winning and Rejected Plans. Under which, we analyzed that although it was using 'IXSCAN.' But, it was incorrect index- as we had one compound index built on time field and other fields, and there was other index just on time field for TTL purposes. Winning plan picked TTL index rather than compound index. Thus, we dropped TTL index and built TTL index on a different time field.  That got our query performance time from 10 seconds to 726 ms. Also, for other query the performance came down from 8 seconds to 4.3 seconds. Then, we ran following -  ...




What is Leadership

 




Spark MongoDB Connector Not leading to correct count or data while reading

  We are using Scala 2.11 , Spark 2.4 and Spark MongoDB Connector 2.4.4 Use Case 1 - We wanted to read a Shareded Mongo Collection and copy its data to another Mongo Collection. We noticed that after Spark Job successful completion. Output MongoDB did not had many records. Use Case 2 -  We read a MongoDB collection and doing count on dataframe lead to different count on each execution. Analysis,  We realized that MongoDB Spark Connector is missing data on bulk read as a dataframe. We tried various partitioner, listed on page -  https://www.mongodb.com/docs/spark-connector/v2.4/configuration/  But, none of them worked for us. Finally, we tried  MongoShardedPartitioner  this lead to constant count on each execution. But, it was greater than the actual count of records on the collection. This seems to be limitation with MongoDB Spark Connector. But,  MongoShardedPartitioner  seemed closest possible solution to this kind of situation. But, it per...