Skip to main content



org.apache.spark.SparkException: Kryo serialization failed: Buffer overflow

 

We were running an application which was leading to below error - 

Job aborted due to stage failure: Task 137 in stage 5.0 failed 4 times, most recent failure: Lost task 137.3 in stage 5.0 (TID 2090, ncABC.hadoop.com, executor 1): org.apache.spark.SparkException: Kryo serialization failed: Buffer overflow. Available: 0, required: 59606960. To avoid this, increase spark.kryoserializer.buffer.max value.
	at org.apache.spark.serializer.KryoSerializerInstance.serialize(KryoSerializer.scala:330)
	at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:456)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Caused by: com.esotericsoftware.kryo.KryoException: Buffer overflow. Available: 0, required: 59606960
	at com.esotericsoftware.kryo.io.Output.require(Output.java:167)
	at com.esotericsoftware.kryo.io.Output.writeBytes(Output.java:251)
	at com.esotericsoftware.kryo.io.Output.writeBytes(Output.java:237)
	at com.esotericsoftware.kryo.serializers.DefaultArraySerializers$ByteArraySerializer.write(DefaultArraySerializers.java:49)
	at com.esotericsoftware.kryo.serializers.DefaultArraySerializers$ByteArraySerializer.write(DefaultArraySerializers.java:38)
	at com.esotericsoftware.kryo.Kryo.writeClassAndObject(Kryo.java:651)
	at com.twitter.chill.Tuple2Serializer.write(TupleSerializers.scala:37)
	at com.twitter.chill.Tuple2Serializer.write(TupleSerializers.scala:33)
	at com.esotericsoftware.kryo.Kryo.writeClassAndObject(Kryo.java:651)


Solution - 

On further analysis, we found that this error was originating from BroadcastNestedLoopJoin

at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$executeQuery$1.apply(SparkPlan.scala:165)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDDOperationScope$.withScope(RDDOperationScope.scala:151)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.executeQuery(SparkPlan.scala:162)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.executeBroadcast(SparkPlan.scala:150)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.BroadcastNestedLoopJoinExec.doExecute(BroadcastNestedLoopJoinExec.scala:343)


So, we removed BroadcastNestedLoopJoin by updating SQL where clause having NOT IN  to NOT EXISTS. Refer details here - http://techdevins.blogspot.com/2021/06/spark-disable-broadcast-join-not.html


This solved our problem.


Alternative Solution - 

We read this solution at multiple places but we didn't try to set below properties - 

--conf  spark.kryoserializer.buffer.max=1024m  spark.kryoserializer.buffer=512m 

And, don't recommend to set it anything other than default values because,

There is a note that there will be one buffer per core on each worker. This buffer will grow up to spark.kryoserializer.buffer.max if needed. 


That said, if you have worker with 4 cores then 4*512m ~ 2GB is taken up for Kryo Buffer, and that seems a good chunk of memory. 


Comments

Popular posts

Spring MongoDB Rename field with derived Value of another field

Input Collection -  [ { 'k' : 'Troubleshooting' , 'hour' : '2024-10-10T16' , 'v' : [ 'WebPage, Login' ] }, { 'k' : 'TroubleshootingMe' , 'hour' : '2024-10-07T01' , 'v' : [ 'Accounts, etc' ] }  ] Expected Output -  [ { 'hour' : '2024-10-10T16' , 'Troubleshooting' : [ 'WebPage, Login' ] }, { 'hour' : '2024-10-07T01' , 'TroubleshootingMe' : [ 'Accounts, etc' ] }  ]   Above Can be achieved by  $replaceRoot / $replaceWith as follows - { $replaceWith : { $mergeObjects : [ { hour : "$hour" }, { "$arrayToObject" : [ [ { k : "$k" , v : "$v" } ] ] } ] } } or { $replaceRoo...




What is Leadership

 




Spark Error - missing part 0 of the schema, 2 parts are expected

 Exception -  Caused by: org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException : Could not read schema from the hive metastore because it is corrupted. (missing part 0 of the schema, 2 parts are expected).; Analysis -  ·          Check for table definition. In TBLProperties, you might find something like this – > spark.sql.sources.schema.numPartCols > 'spark.sql.sources.schema.numParts' 'spark.sql.sources.schema.part.0' > 'spark.sql.sources.schema.part.1' 'spark.sql.sources.schema.part.2' > 'spark.sql.sources.schema.partCol.0' > 'spark.sql.sources.schema.partCol.1' That’s what error seems to say that part1 is defined but part0 is missing.  Solution -  Drop & re-create table. If Table was partitioned  then all partitions  would have been removed. So do either of below -  ·          Msck repair table <db_name>.<table_name> ·    ...




Spark MongoDB Connector Not leading to correct count or data while reading

  We are using Scala 2.11 , Spark 2.4 and Spark MongoDB Connector 2.4.4 Use Case 1 - We wanted to read a Shareded Mongo Collection and copy its data to another Mongo Collection. We noticed that after Spark Job successful completion. Output MongoDB did not had many records. Use Case 2 -  We read a MongoDB collection and doing count on dataframe lead to different count on each execution. Analysis,  We realized that MongoDB Spark Connector is missing data on bulk read as a dataframe. We tried various partitioner, listed on page -  https://www.mongodb.com/docs/spark-connector/v2.4/configuration/  But, none of them worked for us. Finally, we tried  MongoShardedPartitioner  this lead to constant count on each execution. But, it was greater than the actual count of records on the collection. This seems to be limitation with MongoDB Spark Connector. But,  MongoShardedPartitioner  seemed closest possible solution to this kind of situation. But, it per...




Read from a hive table and write back to it using spark sql

In context to Spark 2.2 - if we read from an hive table and write to same, we get following exception- scala > dy . write . mode ( "overwrite" ). insertInto ( "incremental.test2" ) org . apache . spark . sql . AnalysisException : Cannot insert overwrite into table that is also being read from .; org . apache . spark . sql . AnalysisException : Cannot insert overwrite into table that is also being read from .; 1. This error means that our process is reading from same table and writing to same table. 2. Normally, this should work as process writes to directory .hiveStaging... 3. This error occurs in case of saveAsTable method, as it overwrites entire table instead of individual partitions. 4. This error should not occur with insertInto method, as it overwrites partitions not the table. 5. A reason why this happening is because Hive table has following Spark TBLProperties in its definition. This problem will solve for insertInto met...