Skip to main content



Machine Learning Part 3


Refer code @https://github.com/dinesh028/SparkDS/blob/master/src/indore/dinesh/sachdev/uber/UberClusteringDriver.scala

Now days, Machine Learning is helping to improve cities. The analysis of location and behavior patterns within cities allows optimization of traffic, better planning decisions, and smarter advertising. For example, analysis of GPS data to optimize traffic flow, Many companies are using it for Field Technician optimization. It can also be used for recommendations, anomaly detection, and fraud.

Uber is using same to optimize customer experience - https://www.datanami.com/2015/10/05/how-uber-uses-spark-and-hadoop-to-optimize-customer-experience/

In this blog, we will see clustering and the k-means algorithm. And, its usage to analyze public Uber data.

Clustering is a family of unsupervised machine learning algorithms that discover groupings that occur in collections of data by analyzing similarities between input examples. Some examples of clustering uses include customer segmentation and text categorization.

It is a process that can be understood as  -

  1. Analyzing input data to find the patterns.
  2. Train algorithm 
  3. Build the model that recognize pattern and segment data.
  4. Use the model to identify similar segments.

K-means is one of the most commonly used clustering algorithms that clusters the data points into a predefined number of clusters (k). Clustering using the k-means algorithm begins by initializing all the coordinates to k number of centroids.

Image result for k means clustering"
With every pass of the algorithm, each point is assigned to its nearest centroid, based on some distance metric, usually Euclidean distance. The centroids are then updated to be the “centers” of all the points assigned to it in that pass.

This repeats until there is a minimum change in the centers.

First, step we do is read the sample data.

Second, We use a Vector assembler to put features in to a feature vectors, which are vectors of numbers representing the value for each feature.

Third, we transform the read dataframe to add additional column for feature vector.

Fourth, we create a k-means estimator; we set the parameters to define the number of clusters and the column name for the cluster IDs. Then we use the k-means estimator fit method, on the VectorAssembler transformed DataFrame, to train and return a k-means model.

Fifth, We use model to get a dataframe with cluster id's. This dataframe can be used to perform SQL operations to get meaningful statistics. For example -

  • Which clusters had the highest number of pickups?
  • Which hours of the day had the highest number of pickups?
  • Which hours of the day and which cluster had the highest number of pickups?
  • Which clusters had the highest number of pickups during morning rush hour?
  • Which clusters had the highest number of pickups during evening rush hour?
Sixth, We can save the model.

Seventh, we can load the saved model and use it in PROD cases.

Comments

Popular posts

Python [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: Missing Authority Key Identifier

  Error requests.exceptions.SSLError: HTTPSConnectionPool  Max retries exceeded with url:  (Caused by SSLError(SSLCertVerificationError(1, '[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: Missing Authority Key Identifier (_ssl.c:1028)'))). Analysis & Solution Recently, we updated from Python 3.11 to 3.13, which resulted in error above. We did verify AKI = SKI in chain of certificates. Also, imported chain of certificates into certifi. Nothing worked for us. Seemingly, it is a bug with Python 3.13. So, we downgraded to Python 3.12 and it started working. Other problems and solution -  '[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: self-signed certificate in certificate chain (_ssl.c:1006)'))) solution  pip install pip-system-certs [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: certificate has expired  (_ssl.c:1006) solution  1# openssl s_client -showcerts -connect  signin.aws.amazon.com:443  </dev/...




Spring MongoDB Rest API not returning response in 90 seconds which is leading to client timeout

  We have Spring Boot  Rest API deployed in Kubernetes cluster which integrates with MongoDB to fetch the data.  MongoDB is fed with data by a real time Spark & NiFi job.  Our clients complained that for a request what they send they don't have response within 90 seconds. Consider it like an OMS ( Order ManagEment System).  On further analysis, we found that Spark & NiFi processing is happenning within 10 seconds after consuming response data from Kafka. Thus, initally out thought was that it due to delay from upstream to produce data in to Kafka.  Thankfully, our data had create / request  timestamp, and when response was received, and when response was inserted into MongoDB. Subtracting response insert time from request time seemed to be well within 90 seconds. But, still client did timeout on not seeing a response within 90 seconds. This led to confusion on our side.  But, then we realized it was due to Read Preference . We updated this...




MongoDB Regex Query taking more time in Production but same query perform well in UAT

   We came across a situation where-in, MongoDB Query was taking more time in Production like 10 seconds and 4.2 seconds but same query performed well in UAT taking under 400 ms. The very first thought that was evident to us that it is because of amount of data which differed in UAT and Production. Then we ran following to see the execution plan -   db.collection.aggregate(<queries>).explain() This gave us Winning and Rejected Plans. Under which, we analyzed that although it was using 'IXSCAN.' But, it was incorrect index- as we had one compound index built on time field and other fields, and there was other index just on time field for TTL purposes. Winning plan picked TTL index rather than compound index. Thus, we dropped TTL index and built TTL index on a different time field.  That got our query performance time from 10 seconds to 726 ms. Also, for other query the performance came down from 8 seconds to 4.3 seconds. Then, we ran following -  ...




What is Leadership

 




Spark MongoDB Connector Not leading to correct count or data while reading

  We are using Scala 2.11 , Spark 2.4 and Spark MongoDB Connector 2.4.4 Use Case 1 - We wanted to read a Shareded Mongo Collection and copy its data to another Mongo Collection. We noticed that after Spark Job successful completion. Output MongoDB did not had many records. Use Case 2 -  We read a MongoDB collection and doing count on dataframe lead to different count on each execution. Analysis,  We realized that MongoDB Spark Connector is missing data on bulk read as a dataframe. We tried various partitioner, listed on page -  https://www.mongodb.com/docs/spark-connector/v2.4/configuration/  But, none of them worked for us. Finally, we tried  MongoShardedPartitioner  this lead to constant count on each execution. But, it was greater than the actual count of records on the collection. This seems to be limitation with MongoDB Spark Connector. But,  MongoShardedPartitioner  seemed closest possible solution to this kind of situation. But, it per...