Skip to main content



CAP Theorem: Relational Nosql

There are three primary concerns you must balance when choosing a data management system:

  1. Consistency means that each client always has the same view of the data.(all nodes see the same data at the same time)
  2. Availability means that all clients can always read and write.(a guarantee that every request receives a response about whether it was successful or failed)
  3. Partition tolerance means that the system works well across physical network partitions.(the system continues to operate despite arbitrary message loss or failure of part of the system)
Now according to CAP theorem you can pick only 2:
CA, CP, AP

Relational systems are CA systems and typically deals with problem of partitions which can be dealt via replication.

NoSQL systems supports horizontal scalability. To scale horizontally, you need strong network partition tolerance which requires giving up either consistency or availability. NoSQL systems typically accomplish this by relaxing relational abilities and/or loosening transactional semantics.

HBase is an example of CP systems while Cassandra is an example of AP systems.

This does not mean HBase is not available. It means system is basically available indicates that the system does guarantee availability, in terms of the CAP theorem.

Also, it does not mean Cassandra is not consistent. It mean system will become eventualy consistent i.e; the system will become consistent over time, given that the system does not receive input during that time.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts

Spring MongoDB Rename field with derived Value of another field

Input Collection -  [ { 'k' : 'Troubleshooting' , 'hour' : '2024-10-10T16' , 'v' : [ 'WebPage, Login' ] }, { 'k' : 'TroubleshootingMe' , 'hour' : '2024-10-07T01' , 'v' : [ 'Accounts, etc' ] }  ] Expected Output -  [ { 'hour' : '2024-10-10T16' , 'Troubleshooting' : [ 'WebPage, Login' ] }, { 'hour' : '2024-10-07T01' , 'TroubleshootingMe' : [ 'Accounts, etc' ] }  ]   Above Can be achieved by  $replaceRoot / $replaceWith as follows - { $replaceWith : { $mergeObjects : [ { hour : "$hour" }, { "$arrayToObject" : [ [ { k : "$k" , v : "$v" } ] ] } ] } } or { $replaceRoo...
Post a Comment
Read more




What is Leadership

 
Post a Comment
Read more




Spark Error - missing part 0 of the schema, 2 parts are expected

 Exception -  Caused by: org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException : Could not read schema from the hive metastore because it is corrupted. (missing part 0 of the schema, 2 parts are expected).; Analysis -  ·          Check for table definition. In TBLProperties, you might find something like this – > spark.sql.sources.schema.numPartCols > 'spark.sql.sources.schema.numParts' 'spark.sql.sources.schema.part.0' > 'spark.sql.sources.schema.part.1' 'spark.sql.sources.schema.part.2' > 'spark.sql.sources.schema.partCol.0' > 'spark.sql.sources.schema.partCol.1' That’s what error seems to say that part1 is defined but part0 is missing.  Solution -  Drop & re-create table. If Table was partitioned  then all partitions  would have been removed. So do either of below -  ·          Msck repair table <db_name>.<table_name> ·    ...
Post a Comment
Read more




Spark MongoDB Connector Not leading to correct count or data while reading

  We are using Scala 2.11 , Spark 2.4 and Spark MongoDB Connector 2.4.4 Use Case 1 - We wanted to read a Shareded Mongo Collection and copy its data to another Mongo Collection. We noticed that after Spark Job successful completion. Output MongoDB did not had many records. Use Case 2 -  We read a MongoDB collection and doing count on dataframe lead to different count on each execution. Analysis,  We realized that MongoDB Spark Connector is missing data on bulk read as a dataframe. We tried various partitioner, listed on page -  https://www.mongodb.com/docs/spark-connector/v2.4/configuration/  But, none of them worked for us. Finally, we tried  MongoShardedPartitioner  this lead to constant count on each execution. But, it was greater than the actual count of records on the collection. This seems to be limitation with MongoDB Spark Connector. But,  MongoShardedPartitioner  seemed closest possible solution to this kind of situation. But, it per...
Post a Comment
Read more




Read from a hive table and write back to it using spark sql

In context to Spark 2.2 - if we read from an hive table and write to same, we get following exception- scala > dy . write . mode ( "overwrite" ). insertInto ( "incremental.test2" ) org . apache . spark . sql . AnalysisException : Cannot insert overwrite into table that is also being read from .; org . apache . spark . sql . AnalysisException : Cannot insert overwrite into table that is also being read from .; 1. This error means that our process is reading from same table and writing to same table. 2. Normally, this should work as process writes to directory .hiveStaging... 3. This error occurs in case of saveAsTable method, as it overwrites entire table instead of individual partitions. 4. This error should not occur with insertInto method, as it overwrites partitions not the table. 5. A reason why this happening is because Hive table has following Spark TBLProperties in its definition. This problem will solve for insertInto met...
Post a Comment
Read more